Misplaced Pages

Australian Systematic Botany

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Australian Systematic Botany is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal published by CSIRO Publishing . It is devoted to publishing original research, and sometimes review articles, on topics related to systematic botany, such as biogeography, taxonomy and evolution. The journal is broad in scope, covering all plant, algal and fungal groups, including fossils.

#604395

4-449: First published in 1978 as Brunonia , the journal adopted its current name in 1988. The current editor-in-chief is Daniel Murphy ( Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne ). The journal is abstracted and indexed in BIOSIS , CAB Abstracts , Current Contents (Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences), Elsevier BIOBASE , Kew Index , Science Citation Index and Scopus . According to

8-424: Is a publication's editorial leader who has final responsibility for its operations and policies. The editor-in-chief heads all departments of the organization and is held accountable for delegating tasks to staff members and managing them. The term is often used at newspapers , magazines , yearbooks , and television news programs. The editor-in-chief is commonly the link between the publisher or proprietor and

12-480: The Journal Citation Reports , the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 0.648. This article about a botany journal is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . See tips for writing articles about academic journals . Further suggestions might be found on the article's talk page . Editor-in-chief An editor-in-chief ( EIC ), also known as lead editor or chief editor ,

16-438: The editorial staff. The term is also applied to academic journals , where the editor-in-chief gives the ultimate decision whether a submitted manuscript will be published. This decision is made by the editor-in-chief after seeking input from reviewers selected on the basis of relevant expertise. For larger journals, the decision is often upon the recommendation of one of several associate editors who each have responsibility for

#604395